Since 2010, more than $75bn has been set aside in antitrust and class action settlements. 91% of claimants never file to collect. It's clear that many individuals don't have a strategy.
Claim Basics exists to create awareness and provide valuable insights so companies can efficiently collect the funds they are owed.
Since 2010, more than $75bn has been set aside in antitrust and class action settlements. 91% of claimants never file to collect. It's clear that many businesses don't have a strategy.
Claim Basics exists to create awareness and provide valuable insight so companies can more efficiently collect funds the funds they are owed.
Capital recovery is the process a company takes to reclaim funds they are owed. We help you understand the recovery process from antitrust & class action settlements, ensuring rightful claims are met.
Prepare: Understanding the time and cost commitment of allocating resources for a multi-year recovery project is essential.
Monitor: Source channels for applicable cases
Stay Informed: Know when new cases are added and when significant milestones are reached
Identify: Determine the recovery opportunities that benefit you and make claims filing decisions
Analyze: Extract the data necessary to file. Find and review purchases, losses, and more to maximize claim filing data
File: Review the data to maximize claim values and file your claim
Audit: Prioritize time-sensitive claims, necessary documentation, and procedural complexities
Collect: Always verify the accuracy of the funds you recover
Lack of awareness: Most companies are not aware of settlements, the potential collection or their eligibility.
Companies underestimate the value: Settlement notices are confusing and can make claimants skeptical. Understanding how opt outs can increase the value of a claim is always beneficial.
Experience and resources: Companies typically don't have the internal resources to allocate to managing settlements.
Filing your claims could help:
Support fiscal responsibility
Promote long-term business growth
Boost business cash flow and operational efficiency
There are two things that you can do.
You can file in-house.
You can outsource the filing.
Either way, you must have a plan to join the 9% that actually recovers their revenue.
In our belief, doing nothing is never an option.
In most cases, if you do nothing, your funds just get allocated to those that do file. If you don’t have the time or can’t allocate the resources, take 60 seconds to register with Collectively today.
Examples: Fashion and apparel, electronics and gadgets, home and garden, health and beauty, sports and outdoors, books and music, toys and games, jewelry and accessories, pet supplies, automotive parts and accessories, art and collectibles, office supplies, baby products, handmade and craft goods and many more.
Cases you may be eligible for:
Financial cases because you may accept payments from the liable entities
Healthcare cases because you may insure your employees
Electronic cases because you buy cell phones, laptops, and other hardware
Travel cases because your company may travel
Cases in litigation (not limited to):
Financial
Visa Mastercard Settlement:
Summary: Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.6 billion settlement over claims they fixed credit and debit card fees. The filing window ends May 31st, 2024.
Details: This settlement resolved accusations of overcharging retailers on interchange fees and restricting cheaper payment methods.
EMV Chip Fraud Liability Shift (B&R Supermarket v. Visa):
Summary: This lawsuit is against Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover for shifting liability for fraudulent charges to merchants without EMV/chip technology.
Details: The class action includes merchants who incurred unreimbursed chargebacks between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017.
Electronic
Hard Disk Drive:
Summary: Class actions involving various hard drive manufacturers like Western Digital, Seagate, and others, typically alleging issues like misrepresented storage capacities or failure rates.
Details: Businesses that purchased HDDs are likely eligible if this case settles. (HDD Suspension Assemblies are a critical component of HDDs, incorporated into electronic devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, gaming consoles, printers, copy machines, and MP3 players, or sold as stand-alone storage servers.)
Intel CPU Security Vulnerability Litigation:
Summary: Lawsuits against Intel CPUs allege security vulnerabilities like Meltdown, Spectre, and "Downfall," leading to performance degradation.
Details: The litigation is ongoing under the case "Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation" (3:18-md-02828-SI), with the judge allowing claims from September 2017 onward to proceed, focusing on Intel's alleged delayed disclosure of flaws
Qualcomm Chip Litigation:
Summary: Consumer antitrust claims against Qualcomm regarding alleged anti-competitive practices in chip licensing and supply contracts.
Details: Qualcomm succeeded in dismissing some parts of the lawsuit due to lack of evidence, but certain allegations of exclusive dealing continue.
Healthcare
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation:
Summary: Accusations against Blue Cross Blue Shield for engaging in anti-competitive behavior in health insurance sales.
Details: The lawsuit led to a $2.67 billion settlement and required business practice changes for increased competition.
CVS HSP Class Action (Metal workers et AL V. CVS):
Summary: Involves health plans that pay for certain generic prescription drugs from CVS. It alleges that CVS violated federal and state laws by not reporting its Health Savings Pass membership prices as the usual and customary prices to pharmacy benefit managers, leading to overcharges for the drugs.
Details: The lawsuit covers non-governmental health plans that used specific pharmacy benefit managers (i.e. Caremark, Express Scripts, Medco, OptumRx, or MedImpact (or any of their predecessors) and reimbursed them for generic drug purchases from CVS based on prices containing Usual and Customary prices, between November 2008 and February 1, 2016.
Travel
Domestic Air:
Summary: Lawsuit against major U.S. airlines for allegedly colluding to limit capacity on domestic flights, leading to increased fares.
Details: Allegations cover the period from 2009 to 2018, focusing on limiting new seats to artificially raise prices.
Examples: Banking, investment and wealth management, insurance, accounting and tax services, financial planning and consulting, stock exchanges, fintech and digital payment platforms, credit services, mortgage and lending services and many more.
Cases you may be eligible for:
Financial cases because you may accept payments from the liable entities
Healthcare cases because you may insure your employees
Electronic cases because you buy cell phones, laptops, and other hardware
Travel cases because your company may travel
Cases in litigation (not limited to):
Financial
Visa Mastercard Settlement:
Summary: Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.6 billion settlement over claims they fixed credit and debit card fees. The filing window ends May 31st, 2024.
Details: This settlement resolved accusations of overcharging retailers on interchange fees and restricting cheaper payment methods.
EMV Chip Fraud Liability Shift (B&R Supermarket v. Visa):
Summary: This lawsuit is against Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover for shifting liability for fraudulent charges to merchants without EMV/chip technology.
Details: The class action includes merchants who incurred unreimbursed chargebacks between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017.
Electronic
Hard Disk Drive:
Summary: Class actions involving various hard drive manufacturers like Western Digital, Seagate, and others, typically alleging issues like misrepresented storage capacities or failure rates.
Details: Businesses that purchased HDDs are likely eligible if this case settles. (HDD Suspension Assemblies are a critical component of HDDs, incorporated into electronic devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, gaming consoles, printers, copy machines, and MP3 players, or sold as stand-alone storage servers.)
Intel CPU Security Vulnerability Litigation:
Summary: Lawsuits against Intel CPUs allege security vulnerabilities like Meltdown, Spectre, and "Downfall," leading to performance degradation.
Details: The litigation is ongoing under the case "Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation" (3:18-md-02828-SI), with the judge allowing claims from September 2017 onward to proceed, focusing on Intel's alleged delayed disclosure of flaws
Qualcomm Chip Litigation:
Summary: Consumer antitrust claims against Qualcomm regarding alleged anti-competitive practices in chip licensing and supply contracts.
Details: Qualcomm succeeded in dismissing some parts of the lawsuit due to lack of evidence, but certain allegations of exclusive dealing continue.
Healthcare
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation:
Summary: Accusations against Blue Cross Blue Shield for engaging in anti-competitive behavior in health insurance sales.
Details: The lawsuit led to a $2.67 billion settlement and required business practice changes for increased competition.
CVS HSP Class Action (Metal workers et AL V. CVS):
Summary: Involves health plans that pay for certain generic prescription drugs from CVS. It alleges that CVS violated federal and state laws by not reporting its Health Savings Pass membership prices as the usual and customary prices to pharmacy benefit managers, leading to overcharges for the drugs.
Details: The lawsuit covers non-governmental health plans that used specific pharmacy benefit managers (i.e. Caremark, Express Scripts, Medco, OptumRx, or MedImpact (or any of their predecessors) and reimbursed them for generic drug purchases from CVS based on prices containing Usual and Customary prices, between November 2008 and February 1, 2016.
Travel
Domestic Air:
Summary: Lawsuit against major U.S. airlines for allegedly colluding to limit capacity on domestic flights, leading to increased fares.
Details: Allegations cover the period from 2009 to 2018, focusing on limiting new seats to artificially raise prices.
Examples: Fresh produce and packaged foods, meat and dairy products, bakery and confectionery, beverages, organic and health foods, specialty and gourmet foods, supermarkets and grocery stores, online food delivery services, farmers' markets and many more.
Cases you may be eligible for:
Financial cases because you may accept payments from the liable entities
Food cases because you may purchase and handle food-related items
Healthcare cases because you may insure your employees
Electronic cases because you buy cell phones, laptops, and other hardware
Travel cases because your company may travel
Cases in litigation (not limited to):
Financial
Visa Mastercard Settlement:
Summary: Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.6 billion settlement over claims they fixed credit and debit card fees. The filing window ends May 31st, 2024.
Details: This settlement resolved accusations of overcharging retailers on interchange fees and restricting cheaper payment methods.
EMV Chip Fraud Liability Shift (B&R Supermarket v. Visa):
Summary: This lawsuit is against Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover for shifting liability for fraudulent charges to merchants without EMV/chip technology.
Details: The class action includes merchants who incurred unreimbursed chargebacks between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017.
Electronic
Hard Disk Drive:
Summary: Class actions involving various hard drive manufacturers like Western Digital, Seagate, and others, typically alleging issues like misrepresented storage capacities or failure rates.
Details: Businesses that purchased HDDs are likely eligible if this case settles. (HDD Suspension Assemblies are a critical component of HDDs, incorporated into electronic devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, gaming consoles, printers, copy machines, and MP3 players, or sold as stand-alone storage servers.)
Intel CPU Security Vulnerability Litigation:
Summary: Lawsuits against Intel CPUs allege security vulnerabilities like Meltdown, Spectre, and "Downfall," leading to performance degradation.
Details: The litigation is ongoing under the case "Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation" (3:18-md-02828-SI), with the judge allowing claims from September 2017 onward to proceed, focusing on Intel's alleged delayed disclosure of flaws
Qualcomm Chip Litigation:
Summary: Consumer antitrust claims against Qualcomm regarding alleged anti-competitive practices in chip licensing and supply contracts.
Details: Qualcomm succeeded in dismissing some parts of the lawsuit due to lack of evidence, but certain allegations of exclusive dealing continue.
Healthcare
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation:
Summary: Accusations against Blue Cross Blue Shield for engaging in anti-competitive behavior in health insurance sales.
Details: The lawsuit led to a $2.67 billion settlement and required business practice changes for increased competition.
CVS HSP Class Action (Metal workers et AL V. CVS):
Summary: Involves health plans that pay for certain generic prescription drugs from CVS. It alleges that CVS violated federal and state laws by not reporting its Health Savings Pass membership prices as the usual and customary prices to pharmacy benefit managers, leading to overcharges for the drugs.
Details: The lawsuit covers non-governmental health plans that used specific pharmacy benefit managers (i.e. Caremark, Express Scripts, Medco, OptumRx, or MedImpact (or any of their predecessors) and reimbursed them for generic drug purchases from CVS based on prices containing Usual and Customary prices, between November 2008 and February 1, 2016.
Travel
Domestic Air:
Summary: Lawsuit against major U.S. airlines for allegedly colluding to limit capacity on domestic flights, leading to increased fares.
Details: Allegations cover the period from 2009 to 2018, focusing on limiting new seats to artificially raise prices.
Food & Grocery
Beef Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: This settlement, which requires court approval, is a significant development in ongoing nationwide antitrust litigation over beef price-fixing.
Details: JBS SA agreed to pay $52.5 million to settle claims accusing meat-packing companies of conspiring to limit supply in the U.S. beef market, inflating prices. Additional defendants are expected to settle.
Pork Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: This indicates a pattern of alleged anticompetitive practices in the meat industry. Pork producers are accused of conspiring to restrict supply in order to keep prices artificially high
Details: The Settlement requires Smithfield to pay $42,000,000 in the commercial food preparation class. Additional defendants are expected to settle.
Chicken Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: Major chicken producers, including Pilgrim’s Pride and Tyson Foods, faced allegations of price-fixing, resulting in a significant class action settlement.
Details: Pilgrim’s Pride agreed to a $76 million settlement, while Tyson Foods settled for $99 million. These were part of a broader $181 million settlement for purchases from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2020. The case involved claims of conspiring to inflate chicken prices, affecting consumers and businesses.
Turkey Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: Major turkey suppliers, including Butterball and Perdue, faced a class action lawsuit alleging conspiracy to fix turkey prices and limit supply, violating antitrust laws.
Details: The defendants are: Butterball, LLC, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cooper Farms, Inc., Farbest Foods, Inc., Foster Farms LLC, Foster Poultry Farms, Hormel Foods Corporation, House of Raeford Farms, Inc., Perdue Farms, Inc., and Perdue Foods LLC, and Agri Stats, Inc.
Examples: Clinical services, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and equipment, health insurance, telemedicine, biotechnology, mental health services, healthcare IT solutions, home healthcare services and many more.
Cases you may be eligible for:
Financial cases because you may accept payments from the liable entities
Healthcare cases because you may insure your employees
Electronic cases because you buy cell phones, laptops, and other hardware
Travel cases because your company may travel
Cases in litigation (not limited to):
Financial
Visa Mastercard Settlement:
Summary: Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.6 billion settlement over claims they fixed credit and debit card fees. The filing window ends May 31st, 2024.
Details: This settlement resolved accusations of overcharging retailers on interchange fees and restricting cheaper payment methods.
EMV Chip Fraud Liability Shift (B&R Supermarket v. Visa):
Summary: This lawsuit is against Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover for shifting liability for fraudulent charges to merchants without EMV/chip technology.
Details: The class action includes merchants who incurred unreimbursed chargebacks between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017.
Electronic
Hard Disk Drive:
Summary: Class actions involving various hard drive manufacturers like Western Digital, Seagate, and others, typically alleging issues like misrepresented storage capacities or failure rates.
Details: Businesses that purchased HDDs are likely eligible if this case settles. (HDD Suspension Assemblies are a critical component of HDDs, incorporated into electronic devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, gaming consoles, printers, copy machines, and MP3 players, or sold as stand-alone storage servers.)
Intel CPU Security Vulnerability Litigation:
Summary: Lawsuits against Intel CPUs allege security vulnerabilities like Meltdown, Spectre, and "Downfall," leading to performance degradation.
Details: The litigation is ongoing under the case "Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation" (3:18-md-02828-SI), with the judge allowing claims from September 2017 onward to proceed, focusing on Intel's alleged delayed disclosure of flaws
Qualcomm Chip Litigation:
Summary: Consumer antitrust claims against Qualcomm regarding alleged anti-competitive practices in chip licensing and supply contracts.
Details: Qualcomm succeeded in dismissing some parts of the lawsuit due to lack of evidence, but certain allegations of exclusive dealing continue.
Healthcare
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation:
Summary: Accusations against Blue Cross Blue Shield for engaging in anti-competitive behavior in health insurance sales.
Details: The lawsuit led to a $2.67 billion settlement and required business practice changes for increased competition.
CVS HSP Class Action (Metal workers et AL V. CVS):
Summary: Involves health plans that pay for certain generic prescription drugs from CVS. It alleges that CVS violated federal and state laws by not reporting its Health Savings Pass membership prices as the usual and customary prices to pharmacy benefit managers, leading to overcharges for the drugs.
Details: The lawsuit covers non-governmental health plans that used specific pharmacy benefit managers (i.e. Caremark, Express Scripts, Medco, OptumRx, or MedImpact (or any of their predecessors) and reimbursed them for generic drug purchases from CVS based on prices containing Usual and Customary prices, between November 2008 and February 1, 2016.
Travel
Domestic Air:
Summary: Lawsuit against major U.S. airlines for allegedly colluding to limit capacity on domestic flights, leading to increased fares.
Details: Allegations cover the period from 2009 to 2018, focusing on limiting new seats to artificially raise prices.
Examples: Hotels and accommodations, restaurants and catering, travel and tourism, event planning, theme parks, cruise lines, recreational services and many more.
Cases you may be eligible for:
Financial cases because you may accept payments from the liable entities
Healthcare cases because you may insure your employees
Electronic cases because you buy cell phones, laptops, and other hardware
Travel cases because your company may travel
Food cases because you may purchase and handle food-related items
Cases in litigation (not limited to):
Financial
Visa Mastercard Settlement:
Summary: Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.6 billion settlement over claims they fixed credit and debit card fees. The filing window ends May 31st, 2024.
Details: This settlement resolved accusations of overcharging retailers on interchange fees and restricting cheaper payment methods.
EMV Chip Fraud Liability Shift (B&R Supermarket v. Visa):
Summary: This lawsuit is against Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover for shifting liability for fraudulent charges to merchants without EMV/chip technology.
Details: The class action includes merchants who incurred unreimbursed chargebacks between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017.
Electronic
Hard Disk Drive:
Summary: Class actions involving various hard drive manufacturers like Western Digital, Seagate, and others, typically alleging issues like misrepresented storage capacities or failure rates.
Details: Businesses that purchased HDDs are likely eligible if this case settles. (HDD Suspension Assemblies are a critical component of HDDs, incorporated into electronic devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, gaming consoles, printers, copy machines, and MP3 players, or sold as stand-alone storage servers.)
Intel CPU Security Vulnerability Litigation:
Summary: Lawsuits against Intel CPUs allege security vulnerabilities like Meltdown, Spectre, and "Downfall," leading to performance degradation.
Details: The litigation is ongoing under the case "Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation" (3:18-md-02828-SI), with the judge allowing claims from September 2017 onward to proceed, focusing on Intel's alleged delayed disclosure of flaws
Qualcomm Chip Litigation:
Summary: Consumer antitrust claims against Qualcomm regarding alleged anti-competitive practices in chip licensing and supply contracts.
Details: Qualcomm succeeded in dismissing some parts of the lawsuit due to lack of evidence, but certain allegations of exclusive dealing continue.
Healthcare
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation:
Summary: Accusations against Blue Cross Blue Shield for engaging in anti-competitive behavior in health insurance sales.
Details: The lawsuit led to a $2.67 billion settlement and required business practice changes for increased competition.
CVS HSP Class Action (Metal workers et AL V. CVS):
Summary: Involves health plans that pay for certain generic prescription drugs from CVS. It alleges that CVS violated federal and state laws by not reporting its Health Savings Pass membership prices as the usual and customary prices to pharmacy benefit managers, leading to overcharges for the drugs.
Details: The lawsuit covers non-governmental health plans that used specific pharmacy benefit managers (i.e. Caremark, Express Scripts, Medco, OptumRx, or MedImpact (or any of their predecessors) and reimbursed them for generic drug purchases from CVS based on prices containing Usual and Customary prices, between November 2008 and February 1, 2016.
Travel
Domestic Air:
Summary: Lawsuit against major U.S. airlines for allegedly colluding to limit capacity on domestic flights, leading to increased fares.
Details: Allegations cover the period from 2009 to 2018, focusing on limiting new seats to artificially raise prices.
Food & Grocery
Beef Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: This settlement, which requires court approval, is a significant development in ongoing nationwide antitrust litigation over beef price-fixing.
Details: JBS SA agreed to pay $52.5 million to settle claims accusing meat-packing companies of conspiring to limit supply in the U.S. beef market, inflating prices. Additional defendants are expected to settle.
Pork Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: This indicates a pattern of alleged anticompetitive practices in the meat industry. Pork producers are accused of conspiring to restrict supply in order to keep prices artificially high
Details: The Settlement requires Smithfield to pay $42,000,000 in the commercial food preparation class. Additional defendants are expected to settle.
Chicken Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: Major chicken producers, including Pilgrim’s Pride and Tyson Foods, faced allegations of price-fixing, resulting in a significant class action settlement.
Details: Pilgrim’s Pride agreed to a $76 million settlement, while Tyson Foods settled for $99 million. These were part of a broader $181 million settlement for purchases from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2020. The case involved claims of conspiring to inflate chicken prices, affecting consumers and businesses.
Turkey Price-Fixing Litigation:
Summary: Major turkey suppliers, including Butterball and Perdue, faced a class action lawsuit alleging conspiracy to fix turkey prices and limit supply, violating antitrust laws.
Details: The defendants are: Butterball, LLC, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cooper Farms, Inc., Farbest Foods, Inc., Foster Farms LLC, Foster Poultry Farms, Hormel Foods Corporation, House of Raeford Farms, Inc., Perdue Farms, Inc., and Perdue Foods LLC, and Agri Stats, Inc.
Examples: Software development, hardware manufacturing, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, data analytics, cybersecurity, blockchain technology, internet of things (IoT), e-commerce platforms, social media networks, and telecommunication services and many more.
Cases you may be eligible for:
Financial cases because you may accept payments from the liable entities
Healthcare cases because you may insure your employees
Electronic cases because you buy cell phones, laptops, and other hardware
Travel cases because your company may travel
Cases in litigation (not limited to):
Financial
Visa Mastercard Settlement:
Summary: Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.6 billion settlement over claims they fixed credit and debit card fees. The filing window ends May 31st, 2024.
Details: This settlement resolved accusations of overcharging retailers on interchange fees and restricting cheaper payment methods.
EMV Chip Fraud Liability Shift (B&R Supermarket v. Visa):
Summary: This lawsuit is against Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover for shifting liability for fraudulent charges to merchants without EMV/chip technology.
Details: The class action includes merchants who incurred unreimbursed chargebacks between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017.
Electronic
Hard Disk Drive:
Summary: Class actions involving various hard drive manufacturers like Western Digital, Seagate, and others, typically alleging issues like misrepresented storage capacities or failure rates.
Details: Businesses that purchased HDDs are likely eligible if this case settles. (HDD Suspension Assemblies are a critical component of HDDs, incorporated into electronic devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, gaming consoles, printers, copy machines, and MP3 players, or sold as stand-alone storage servers.)
Intel CPU Security Vulnerability Litigation:
Summary: Lawsuits against Intel CPUs allege security vulnerabilities like Meltdown, Spectre, and "Downfall," leading to performance degradation.
Details: The litigation is ongoing under the case "Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation" (3:18-md-02828-SI), with the judge allowing claims from September 2017 onward to proceed, focusing on Intel's alleged delayed disclosure of flaws
Qualcomm Chip Litigation:
Summary: Consumer antitrust claims against Qualcomm regarding alleged anti-competitive practices in chip licensing and supply contracts.
Details: Qualcomm succeeded in dismissing some parts of the lawsuit due to lack of evidence, but certain allegations of exclusive dealing continue.
Healthcare
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation:
Summary: Accusations against Blue Cross Blue Shield for engaging in anti-competitive behavior in health insurance sales.
Details: The lawsuit led to a $2.67 billion settlement and required business practice changes for increased competition.
CVS HSP Class Action (Metal workers et AL V. CVS):
Summary: Involves health plans that pay for certain generic prescription drugs from CVS. It alleges that CVS violated federal and state laws by not reporting its Health Savings Pass membership prices as the usual and customary prices to pharmacy benefit managers, leading to overcharges for the drugs.
Details: The lawsuit covers non-governmental health plans that used specific pharmacy benefit managers (i.e. Caremark, Express Scripts, Medco, OptumRx, or MedImpact (or any of their predecessors) and reimbursed them for generic drug purchases from CVS based on prices containing Usual and Customary prices, between November 2008 and February 1, 2016.
Travel
Domestic Air:
Summary: Lawsuit against major U.S. airlines for allegedly colluding to limit capacity on domestic flights, leading to increased fares.
Details: Allegations cover the period from 2009 to 2018, focusing on limiting new seats to artificially raise prices.
01
Match you with a claim you're eligible for
02
File on your behalf and keep you updated along the way
03
Collect the money you're entitled to
We are dedicated to empowering business owners with the knowledge and insights necessary for making informed decisions about capital recovery. Our goal is to streamline the process of identifying and claiming funds from antitrust and class action settlements. We provide clear, comprehensive information on how revenue recovery works, its relevance to your business, and the steps involved in pursuing a claim. Whether you're new to the concept or looking to deepen your understanding, our resources are designed to guide you through the intricacies of this process, helping you to recognize potential opportunities for financial recovery and enhance your business's fiscal health.
We stand out from other settlement recovery companies by prioritizing education and insight as much as recovery outcomes. Our approach is centered on empowering you with knowledge through thought leadership.
Here's how we make a difference:
Commitment to Education: We believe that informed decisions are the best decisions. Our resources and communications are designed not just to guide you through the recovery process but to deepen your understanding of the entire landscape of capital recovery.
Thought Leadership: Our expertise goes beyond mere process assistance. We provide thought leadership in the field, offering analyses, trends, and insights that help you understand the broader implications and opportunities of settlement claims.
Comprehensive Information: We strive to equip you with all the information you need. From detailed guides on navigating complex settlements to updates on the latest developments in antitrust and class action cases, we ensure you have access to comprehensive and up-to-date knowledge.
Empowering Your Decisions: Our goal is to make you a more knowledgeable and confident participant in the settlement recovery process. We provide the tools and information necessary for you to make decisions that are best suited to your business's unique needs and circumstances.
Collectively and Claim Basics does not engage in legal practice and therefore does not offer legal advice. We are not attorneys, nor are we officially associated with class counsel or claims administration. Instead, Claim Basics is here to provide information. Collectively specializes in the field of class action settlement management. Their expertise lies in handling the administrative aspects of settlements. This includes the preparation and submission of necessary documents and claim forms. Additionally, they collaborate with settlement administrators to ensure the accurate reconciliation and distribution of recoveries according to the terms of the settlements. For those seeking legal advice or services, it is recommended to contact class counsel or a personal attorney.
Collectively offers a range of services focused on helping businesses and consumers with class action settlement claims. Their primary services include identifying eligible class action settlements, automating the claim filing process, and managing the entire claim from filing to collection. Using advanced, cloud-based technology, Collectively streamlines the process, making it more efficient and user-friendly for their clients. This technology-driven approach enables more effective tracking and management of claims, ensuring clients can maximize their potential recoveries from various settlements.
Collectively's technology monitors and identifies recovery opportunities for businesses. This process involves collecting forms for eligible claimants and simplifying the claims process through their innovative software.
Collectively's infrastructure is designed to be secure, scalable, and customizable, with a primary a focus on data security and privacy.
Collectively manages the full process from filing to collection. Feel free to kick back, relax, and go about your business. They'll do the hard work for you.
They cannot predict the time it will take for funds to be collected. Unfortunately, they cannot guarantee you an effective time range.
Collectively offers opportunities to collect in multiple categories including auto, freight, electronics, healthcare, financial, food & grocery, packaging, travel, and more. There is a wide range of class action settlements and industries they can assist with.
Read our latest articles and stay up-to-date with the latest news and insights in the world of anti trust and class action settlement.
Access expert advice and tips from professionals with extensive experience in navigating complex settlement procedure.
Learn about the financial implications of settlements and how they can affect your business's bottom line.
We respect your privacy, unsubscribe anytime.